Lecture 26
A Black Theology of Liberation
Liberation theology arose in the third world--specifically Latin America--where it was recognized that one's view of God and his action in the world can be profoundly altered by one's praxis or experience of life. The God of the wealthy is rather different from the God worshipped in the barrios or slums of the major cities in such countries as Peru or Brazil. This idea that one's view of the gospel is shaped by one's location in life has taken firm root in certain groups in the United States, and specifically among blacks and women.
Black Theology
There are many reasons why Christianity has not been real for
blacks. To begin with, white Christianity emphasizes individualism,
and divides the world into separate realms of the sacred and secular,
public and private. Such a view of the world is alien to African-American
spirituality. The Christianity that was communicated to blacks had as its primary focus life in world to come. This was at odds with traditional
African spirituality which was focused on life in the present world.
And if that were not enough, Christianity is hopelessly associated
with slavery and segregation in the minds of many African-Americans.
More importantly, there are reasons to believe that many African-Americans
are beginning to reject Christianity. The growing presence of
Islam in the African-American community is nurtured by a variety of forces, but one of its principle sources of strength is the sense within many blacks of a tremendous gap that exists between
what takes place in the Church on Sunday, and how church people
live the rest of the week. Many of the new converts to Islam were
Christian, but they testify to seeing little coherence between the worship of the church, and the rough and tumble world of
the streets the rest of the week.
One element of Islam that has attracted many African-Americans is the fact that Muslims have a strong reputation for living what they preach. Whereas church members might spend much of their week hanging out and drinking, Muslims demonstrate discipline, respect, and personal integrity that many in the black community
feel is lacking among many members of the church. In a similar
fashion, the Muslim claim that Christianity was imposed on blacks
by the slaveholders has struck a sensitive nerve in the black
community, and has aided them in the effort to win new converts.
Growing numbers of blacks have accepted the proposition that Islam
was the original faith of African-Americans. As a result, the
same forces driving Afro-centrism are also prompting many blacks
to explore their roots in Islam.
In the face of all this, the question that confronts the advocates
of a black theology of liberation is somewhat intimidating. "Can
one still be black, and believe in the biblical tradition as expressed
in the Old and New Testaments?" Can the Christian faith be
stripped of the interpretations given these sacred texts by whites,
and be made real for black men and women?
Liberation theology as it has expressed itself in the African-American
community seeks to find a way to make the gospel relevant to black
people who must struggle daily under the burden of white oppression.
The question that confronts these black theologians is not one
that is easily answered. "What if anything does the Christian
gospel have to say to powerless black men," to use James
Cone's words, whose existence is "threatened on a daily basis
by the insidious tentacles of white power?" If the gospel
has nothing to say to people as they confront the daily realities
of life, it is a lifeless message. If Christianity is not real
for blacks, then they will reject it.
The Starting Point for a Black Theology of Liberation
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me to preach the good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives
and recovering of sight to the blind,
To set at liberty those who are oppressed,
to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord. (Luke 4:18-19)
From this text, Cone draws a fundamental lesson about Jesus:
his "work is essentially one of liberation." Jesus inaugurates
"an age of liberation in which 'the blind receive their sight,
the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead
are raised up, and the poor have the good news preached to them.'"
(Luke 7:22) "In Christ," Cone argues, "God enters
human affairs and takes sides with the oppressed. Their suffering
becomes his; their despair, divine despair."
Cone continues his line of argument with a force that cuts to
the marrow of contemporary American Christianity: "Jesus
had little toleration for the middle- or upper-class religious
snob whose attitude attempted to usurp the sovereignty of God
and destroy the dignity of the poor," Cone writes, "The
Kingdom is not for the poor and not the rich because the former
has nothing to expect from the world while the latter's entire
existence is grounded in his commitment to worldly things. The
poor man may expect everything from God, while the rich man may
expect nothing because he refuses to free himself from his own
pride. It is not that poverty is a pre-condition for entrance
into the Kingdom. But those who recognize their utter dependence
on God, and wait on him despite the miserable absurdity of life
are typically the poor, according to Jesus."
When black people hear this message, Cone insists, they discover
a message that resonates with their experience of life. Their
experience of struggling for liberation is the same as the struggle
of Christ himself. And if Jesus was resurrected, and is now alive,
then he is now fighting for the very same things, working against
the structures of injustice.
To develop a theology that speaks to African-Americans, black
liberation theologians such as James Cone begin with the person
of Jesus, and specifically the Jesus revealed in the Gospel of
Luke. In Luke's gospel, Jesus has a concern for the oppressed
that does not always come through in the other gospels. Luke's
Jesus begins his ministry with this announcement:
The Great Satan
Cone writes: "Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong
when he called the white man 'the devil.' The white structure
of this American society, personified in every racist, must be
at least part of what the New Testament meant by demonic forces...Ironically,
the man who enslaves another enslaves himself...To be free to
do what I will in relation to another is to be in bondage to the
law of least resistance. This is the bondage of racism. Racism
is that bondage in which whites are free to beat, rape, or kill
blacks. About thirty years ago it was acceptable to lynch a black
man by hanging him from a tree; but today whites destroy him by
crowding him into a ghetto and letting filth and despair put the
final touches on death."
James Cone wrote those words in 1968, and while they are dated,
they still convey a powerful truth. What happened to Rodney King
at the hands of the Los Angeles police continues to happen to
black men with disturbing frequency. The jails and prisons are
filling with black men. One third of all black men are now under
the jurisdiction of the courts or prison system. And one of the
principle reasons are drug laws designed to punish with mandatory
prison terms those who use "rock cocaine" (the principle
form of cocaine used in the black community because it is relatively
inexpensive), while penalties for possession of the powder form
(the form used by wealthy whites) are largely financial, and do
not require one to serve time. Why would society design a criminal
justice system with such disparate impact? Cone and many blacks
would lay the blame at the feet of the demonic force of racism.
In the New Testament, Jesus comes into the world to destroy the
works of Satan. If the preceding identification of the struggle
of Jesus and that of African-Americans seeking liberation is true,
then there must also be a Satan in the contemporary picture. Black
Theology does not get bogged down in quaint personifications of
Satan (the current issue of Newsweek has a wonderful
article on Satan, by the way), but sees him at work in the powers
and principalities of this world that would enslave and demean
human beings. And the most demonic of these powers in the black
experience is that of racism.
The Goal of a Black Theology of Liberation
Karl Barth--who was not black--recognized the legitimacy of this
demand. "For this reason, Barth wrote, "in the relations
and events in the life of his people, God always takes his stand
unconditionally and passionately on this side alone: against the
lofty and on behalf of the lowly; against those who already enjoy
right and privilege and on behalf of those who are denied it and
deprived of it."
Black liberation theologians do not intend to allow the church--whether
it be white or black--to evade this responsibility. It "cannot
say that the poor are in poverty because they will not work, or
that they suffer because they are lazy. Having come before God
as nothing and being received by him into his Kingdom through
grace, the Christian should know that he has been made righteous
(justified) so that he (or she) can join God in the fight for
justice. Therefore, whoever fights for the poor, fights for God;
whoever risks his life for the helpless and unwanted, risks his
life for God."
Precisely what this entails is not always clear to whites. For
them, loving one's neighbor "becomes emotional and sentimental.
This sentimental, condescending love accounts for their desire
to "help" by relieving the physical pains of the suffering
blacks so they can satisfy their own religious piety and keep
the poor powerless." But advocates of a black theology of
liberation will not allow whites to get off so easy. "Authentic
love is not 'help,'" Cone writes, "not giving Christmas
baskets, but working for political, social, and economic justice,
which always means a redistribution of power. It is the kind of
power which enables blacks to fight their own battles and thus
keep their dignity."
What is the goal of a black theology of liberation? Is it a society
in which blacks are given special treatment and rights? No. All
Black theologians are asking for is for freedom and justice. No
more, and no less. In asking for this, the Black theologians,
turn to scripture as the sanction for their demand. The Psalmist
writes for instance, "If God is going to see righteousness
established in the land, he himself must be particularly active
as 'the helper of the fatherless' (Psalm 10:14) to 'deliver the
needy when he crieth; and the poor that hath no helper' (Psalm
72:12).
Some Closing Comments
But I would be willing to contend that if the great chasm that
separates the races in this nation is to ever be bridged, it will
require that we bring to the discussion something more than good
intentions, or pious words about making sure everyone is treated
with equity. Not only will we have to bring to the conversation
a willingness to try to understand the pain African-Americans
feel, but we will also have to recognize that we are so intimately
involved in a racist system, that we are often oblivious to the degree
that we have caused or continue to cause that pain.
Perhaps the real test of whether whites can communicate with
blacks as human beings is not what we might say to a Colin Powell,
who--like King--does not challenge whites to confront their racism,
but rather how we choose to respond to a Louis Farrakhan who challenges
us in ways we would prefer not to be challenged.
Many whites, myself included, can be put off by advocates of
a black theology of liberation. We would much prefer the approach
of Martin Luther King, Jr. because his approach was the least
threatening to the white power structure, and to our own understanding
of ourselves. Many whites identified with him precisely because
he did not challenge their own racism directly, and allowed them
to assuage their own sense of guilt with little or no risk.