Yesterday (24 March),
the Archbishops of Canterbury and York led a walk of witness
through London, meeting the March of the Abolitionists - a group walked
from Hull, Wilberforce's birthplace, to London wearing chains to
symbolise shame at Britain's role.
The Observer
(March 25, 2007)
reported that the Archbishop of the West Indies, who
joined the Archbishops of Canterbury and York at a prayer service
in London yesterday commemorating the abolition of the slave trade in
the UK, said the Prime Minister would be the 'appropriate person' to
deliver an apology. Campaigners say the failure to apologise could
overshadow plans for an annual day commemorating abolition. The Archbishop of the
West Indies, Drexel Gomez, said that while there might be only a
'technical difference' between regret and a full apology, 'an apology
is in order because we have to acknowledge our past if we are to build
our future,' he told the BBC Today programme.
Then on 26 March 2007 [Daily Telegraph]
on BBC Radio 4, Archbishop Rowan Williams went even further,
saying that institutions that profited from slavery should make amends -
possibly financially. He said that organisations that were compensated
in the 1830s were still 'living off the historical legacy' and
had a responsibility to future generations. Apologising for the
'terrible things' done in the past is only a start.
He added that the Church of
England was considering paying reparations.
In contrast, the Prime Minister had told a press conference with the Ghanaian President earlier
this month that he was 'sorry' about what had happened, but stopped
short of the formal apology whereas Ken Livingstone,
London's
mayor, made a full apology earlier this week.
The British Council's
commemorative event in Ghana today includes Blair's expression of his
deep regret at the inhumanity and degradation caused by what he
has described as a crime against humanity. Lady Amos,
the Leader of the Lords and herself descended from slaves, is to call it
'one of the most shameful and uncomfortable chapters in British
history'.
Downing Street's
position reflects concern that it is difficult for the current
generation to apologise for wrongs done centuries ago by distant
forebears, while apologies may also open
the question of liability for reparation. Amos, attending the
event in Ghana, will tackle criticism that the celebrations have
focused too much on the role of one white man - William Wilberforce,
the Tory MP who led the parliamentary anti-slavery movement - and not
enough on the black resistance movement.
The bicentenary of
the 1807 legislation abolishing the slave trade has sparked
comparisons with the maltreatment of ethnic minorities in modern
Britain. Yesterday,
the Bishop of
Liverpool, James
Jones, drew
a parallel between the exploitation of Africans and the murder of
teenager Anthony Walker, killed with an axe as he ran away from racist
thugs in the city. Jones told a congregation at Liverpool Cathedral
that the more he studied history, 'the
more I believe that our racism is rooted in the dehumanising treatment
of black people by white people'.
He read out an account by John Newton, the former slave ship
commander turned abolitionist, describing the practice of 'jointing' -
hacking slaves to death with an axe and
throwing their body parts to other slaves.
On the other hand,
MICHAEL NAZIR-ALI, Bishop of Rochester
took the establishment line. In an article entitled 'Why I am NOT saying
sorry for slavery' (Sunday Mail
25 March 07), he praised Britain lavishly.
"This weekend marks the 200th anniversary of the
abolition of the slave trade by Act of Parliament.
Politicians, religious leaders and social activists
have all joined in to bewail the undoubted horrors of slavery and to
apologise for British complicity in this social evil.
Those marching have been shackled hand and foot and have been wearing
sweatshirts saying: "So sorry."
And yet this should be a time of
celebration and of thanksgiving for
Britain's role in bringing this great oppression and cruelty to an end.
Why do the leaders and people of this country find it so difficult to
acknowledge their achievements and to recognise the true source of their
moral commitments?
If a civilisation is constantly criticised, run down and apologised for,
the danger is that its virtues will cease to flourish... "
Mandela boycotts Bristol's slavery commemoration
Independent
on Sunday (25 March 2007) reported that
Nelson Mandela has
boycotted plans to commemorate the bicentennial of the Act abolishing
the slave trade in
Bristol after hearing of bitter divisions within the community and
accusations of racism and intolerance. Mr Mandela had been invited to
Bristol, once
one of the busiest slave ports in
Britain,
by the Lord Mayor, councillor Peter Abraham, for a service of
remembrance due to take place today.
But South Africa's
former president declined the invitation after local black organisations
contacted him to say his presence would be seen as condoning an
overwhelmingly white city council which is accused of riding roughshod
over the wishes of the city's black population. Spokeswoman
Hilary Banks of
the Consortium of Black Groups said: "We pointed out to Mr
Mandela that
Bristol is not
quite the liberal, multi-racial place it pretends to be. We said that if
you do come to
Bristol, we'd
like your visit to change the position of the black people in the city.
We did not tell him not to come; that was obviously his own decision."
African protestor
disrupts Westminster service
CounterPunch,
March 29, 2007 (By MICHAEL
DICKINSON)
Britain's Queen Elizabeth and Prime
Minister Tony Blair were among a congregation of 2000
attending the memorial service at London's historic Westminster Abbey
earlier this week to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the abolition
of slavery, quickly glanced at their programmes. Included in the
schedule were speeches and readings from the writings of abolitionist
William Wilberforce delivered by a succession of dignitaries
and church leaders.
The next item was to be a recitation of the Absolution prayers, but
suddenly a clean shaven black man in a colorful African tunic stormed
out of his seat and moved up the central aisle towards where the Queen
sat with her husband, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, along with
senior members of the government and their wives.
He shouted within almost 10 feet of them, and pointing: "This
service is a disgrace! An insult to Africa.
You are the Queen and the Prime Minister--this is all wrong. You
don't have the decency, Mr Blair, to make an apology and the word sorry,
and you, the Queen ... "
Abbey ushers and security-men rushed forward to
tackle him as he roared: "I'm a proud African.
Men of God should be ashamed. We should not be here. This is a white
man's service--it is an insult to us. I want all the Christians who are
Africans to walk out."
Uniformed police entered the church and lent their
force to drag the angry black away as he shouted and pointed at the
icy-faced Queen. Outside he was handcuffed and arrested under Section 5
of the Public Order Act. His name: Toyin Agbetu. Age: 39. As a
founder of the African-British human rights organisation, Ligali, which
campaigns against racial discrimination and fights for black people's
rights, Agbetu had obtained a media pass to attend the ceremony.
"It was an insult to us. This is
just a memorial for William Wilberforce. There was no mention in there
of African freedom fighters. What about my ancestors? Where were the
Africans talking about how they feel?
"The three major institutions involved in slavery - the monarchy, the
government and the church - are all inside there, patting each other on
the back. No one has had the decency to say the word 'Sorry'."
The Royal Family and Government have both refused
to follow the example of the Church of England and apologise publicly
for their roles in the slave trade. Blair has
expressed instead a "deep sorrow and regret" for the suffering caused.
And royal aides insist that the Queen was acknowledging her family's
role and the wrongs of past generations by simply attending the service.
Toyin Agbetu, however, demands that the Queen
officially apologize for the monarchy's role in supporting the slave
trade, an industry upon which much of the wealth of the UK was built on.
"She has to say sorry. Queen Elizabeth 1
commissioned John Hawkins, financed him, and funded him to go to my
continent and enslave my people."
(In 1564 she loaned Hawkins her armed 700-ton ship, Jesus of Lubeck, as
a slave vessel, made money from the investment, and knighted him for his
efforts.)