|
|
|
|
Asian Diaspora
Commentaries &
critiques, essays & reviews
The
site
is devoted to a wide range of issues of interest and relevance to the South Asian Diaspora
settled in the West and elsewhere.
|
We use the term 'host' or receiver to denote the country where the diaspora have settled. Diaspora-related issues can arise from three broadly based categories:
a) Life in the
receiving country - How did we get here? How have we been received? - What have we achieved so far - in education, Arts, business,...? - What sort of society is this? What are its values? Is it multicultural? How tolerant, just or equal? - How are we
relating to the host society, state institutions & local communities? b) Relating to the homeland. - through professional contacts, community projects, cultural exchanges, responses to political & economic developments of concern to the diaspora.
c) Relations between (i) host & homeland, (ii) West & Third World This category throws up a huge range of issues: colonial history, imperialism, religion, media etc.
|
Here are broad areas to be explored:
|
Noam Chomsky, political analyst and social
critic (1969):
Salman Rushdie,
novelist, about TV misrepresentations (1984):
A Sivanandan,
Director of the Institute of Race Relations, London (1992):
Edward Said (1935-2003) renowned
scholar & literary critic
Read about
the New Diaspora Forum Contact: info@new-diaspora.com
|
|||||
Selected Topics
|
Democracy
Western version In the West, people are allowed to choose from a party-selected list of representatives every 4 or 5 years. These reps have been selected by political parties not by consulting the people but who are acceptable to the state and corporate elites. The winning party forms the government but the people have no power to monitor the performance reps who remain under the control of the party
.UK
democracy in crisis
The Independent (27 Feb 06)
commented:
Equality
Freedom
Grief & Compassion
History History writing - what historians say
Justice
Language in the service of power
Language & propaganda
Morality
Modernity
Orientalism
Said's Introductions 1978 & 2003
Nation & Nation-State
Rationality |
Critique
on India Introduction 2)
Professor Bhikku Parekh
(Sep06)
Democracy “Most politicians are corrupt, and many come from a criminal background. “
Parliament
By and large,
Indian senior politicians are tired old men,
intellectual
lightweights, with poor
communication skills and little diplomatic
flair. Before
western leaders, they get deferential and are unable With nothing new or intelligent to say, no concrete proposals or prescriptions to offer. they descend into banal utterances, clichés & platitudes.
Foreign
Relations
If rationality is the key constituent of modernity. then Several casualties of irrationality have befallen the Indian political and social system, such as:
- a damaged capacity
to think or explain logically coherently,
- an aversion to
intellectual pursuits (rational discussion, debate, dialogue) at the
institutional level
- disinterest in a culture
of excellence or attention to detail
- difficulty in generating
new ideas, handling abstract concepts or complex themes
- faulty planning of
events that often lead to chaos and disorganisation
- in the absence of own
ideas, a tendency to expropriate others' ideas, to plagiarise or imitate.
Read more
People had grown
barbarous, indifferent and self-wounding. India is a country held together by no intellectual current; it is profoundly dependent on others, both for questions and answers. Every discipline, skill and proclaimed ideal of the modern Indian state is a copy of something known to exist elsewhere. Indians, including the holy men, have continually to look outside for approval. Local judgment has no value. Without the foreign chit, Indians can have no confirmation of their own reality. Read more |